Principles of radiometric dating radiobordersdating com

So it is possible that relative radioactive ages of rocks, in addition to mineral contents and other rock features, could be used to compare and correlate similar rocks in other areas to find which ones formed at the same time during the events detailed in Genesis, God’s eyewitness account of earth history. How could recently discovered dinosaur tissue have survived until today?Why is the first fossil layer filled with such an astonishing variety of life (“the Cambrian Explosion”)?The different clocks have ticked at different, faster rates in the past, so the standard old ages are certainly not accurate, correct, or absolute.

principles of radiometric dating-68principles of radiometric dating-11principles of radiometric dating-30principles of radiometric dating-37

Once again, the radioactive clocks have correctly shown that those two rock units are older than the rock units above them.The radioactive clocks in the rock units at the bottom of the Grand Canyon, formed during Creation Week, have been ticking for longer than the radioactive clocks in the younger sedimentary layers higher up in the sequence that were formed later during the Flood.Although it is a mistake to accept radioactive dates of millions of years, the clocks can still be useful to us, in principle, to date the relative sequence of rock formation during earth history.So how do we explain that they have each recorded different ages? Each of the radioactive elements must have decayed at different, faster rates in the past!In the case of the Cardenas Basalt, while the potassium-argon clock ticked through 516 million years, two other clocks ticked through 1,111 million years and 1,588 million years.

Leave a Reply